Infective Outcomes of Semi-Rigid Ureteroscopy in Patients With Positive Preoperative Leucocyte Esterase: A Retrospective Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32896/tij.v6n1.5-13Keywords:
ureteroscopy, leucocyte esterase, urinary tract infection, URSAbstract
Background: Ureteroscopy is the standard of care for ureteral diseases such as urolithiasis, yet it carries the risk of postoperative infectious complications.¹,² Screening for urinary tract infection via leucocyte esterase on dipstick is routine; however, LE can be false-positive in the presence of stone-related inflammation, creating a dilemma when urine culture and sensitivity results are not immediately available.³ We aim to evaluate the safety and outcomes of proceeding with semi-rigid URS based on clinical findings and dipstick parameters while C&S results are retrospectively reviewed.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 231 patients who underwent semi-rigid URS at Sultan Ahmad Shah Medical Centre between December 2018 and December 2023. All included patients had positive preoperative LE but negative nitrite and no clinical signs of infection. Surgical timing was determined by dipstick findings rather than awaiting C&S results, with culture data analyzed retrospectively.
Results: Postoperative urinary tract infection occurred in 16 patients. Only 18 patients had positive urine cultures upon retrospective review, indicating a 92.2% discrepancy rate between LE positivity and true bacteriuria. Multivariate logistic regression identified retrospectively positive urine culture and prior history of UTI as independent predictors of postoperative infection.
Conclusion: Semi-rigid URS can be performed safely in patients with positive preoperative LE when clinical assessment and negative nitrite support proceeding, even before culture results are known. The high discrepancy between LE and C&S supports a pragmatic approach of not delaying surgery for LE positivity alone, while retrospective C&S data serves effectively for postoperative risk stratification.
References
Bafna P, Deepanjali S, Mandal J, et al. Reevaluating the true diagnostic accuracy of dipstick tests to diagnose urinary tract infection using Bayesian latent class analysis. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0244870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244870.
Bai J, Chi Y, Shangguan T, et al. Intrarenal pressure detection during flexible ureteroscopy with fiber optic pressure sensor system in porcine model. Sci Rep. 2024;14:9446. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60080-z.
Chernaya A, Søborg C, Midttun M. Validity of the urinary dipstick test in the diagnosis of urinary tract infections in adults. Dan Med J. 2021;69:A07210607.
Somani BK, Giusti G, Sun Y, et al. Complications associated with ureterorenoscopy related to treatment of urolithiasis: the Clinical Research Office of Endourological Society URS Global study. World J Urol. 2017;35:675-681. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1909-0.
Chugh S, Pietropaolo A, Montanari E, et al. Predictors of Urinary Infections and Urosepsis After Ureteroscopy for Stone Disease: a Systematic Review from EAU Section of Urolithiasis. Curr Urol Rep. 2020;21:16. doi: 10.1007/s11934-020-0969-2.
Croghan SM, Skolarikos A, Jack GS, et al. Upper urinary tract pressures in endourology: a systematic review of range, variables and implications. BJU Int. 2023;131:267-279. doi: 10.1111/bju.15764.
Dybowski B, Bres-Niewada E, Rzeszutko M, et al. Risk factors for infectious complications after retrograde intrarenal surgery – a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Cent Eur J Urol. 2021;74:437-445. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2021.250.
Grüne B, Viehweger V, Waldbillig F, et al. Preoperative urine culture – Is it necessary to prevent infectious complications following ureterorenoscopy? J Infect Dev Ctries. 2020;14:1222-1230. doi: 10.31899/jidc.2020.0109.
Paydaş Hataysal E, Saraçlıgil B, Türk Dağı H, et al. How accurate is the urine dipstick test for diagnosing urinary tract infection? Eur Res J. 2018;5:613-617.
Lildal SK, Hansen ESS, Laustsen C, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced MRI visualizing backflow at increasing intra-renal pressure in a porcine model. PLoS One. 2023;18:e0281676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281676.
Lane J, Whitehurst L, Hameed BMZ, et al. Correlation of Operative Time with Outcomes of Ureteroscopy and Stone Treatment: a Systematic Review of Literature. Curr Urol Rep. 2020;21:17. doi: 10.1007/s11934-020-0970-9.
Liu Y, Chen Y, Liao B, et al. Epidemiology of urolithiasis in Asia. Asian J Urol. 2018;5:205-214.
Ordon M, Andonian S, Blew B, et al. CUA Guideline: Management of ureteral calculi. Can Urol Assoc J. 2015;9(11-12):E837-51. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.3483.
Perumal KR, Chua RHB, Teh GC, Lei CC. Prevalence of urolithiasis in Sarawak and associated risk factors: An ultrasonography-based cross-sectional study. BJUI Compass. 2022;4:74-80. doi: 10.1002/bco2.152.
Whitehurst L, Somani BK. Semi-rigid ureteroscopy: indications, tips, and tricks. Urolithiasis. 2018;46:39-45. doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-1025-7.
Cole A, Telang J, Kim T-K, et al. Infection-related hospitalization following ureteroscopic stone treatment: results from a surgical collaborative. BMC Urol. 2020;20:176. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00755-4.
Kazan HÖ, Çakıcı MÇ, Keser F, et al. The Role of Preoperative Urinalysis in Predicting Postoperative Infection After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in Patients with Sterile Urine Culture. Turk J Urol. 2022;48:136-141.
Carobbio F, Zamboni S, Cristinelli L, et al. Role of cultural analysis in patients with indwelling ureteral stent submitted to ureteroscopy for stones. Urologia. 2020;87(2-Supplement):50-55. doi: 10.53041/UROL2020.2.S.50.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


