TY - JOUR AU - Mohamad Sharin, Mohamad Fairuz AU - Jagwani, Arvind AU - Yusof, Razaleigh AU - Lee, Fei Yee AU - Tharek, Anas AU - Christopher Lee, Kheng Siang AU - Mohd Zainuddin, Saiful Azli AU - Arunasalam, Arun AU - Abdul Rahim, Ridzuan AU - Abdul Rahim, Ezamin AU - Mohd Ghani, Khairul Asri PY - 2023/03/31 Y2 - 2024/03/29 TI - Prostatic Artery Embolization for The Treatment of Benign Prostatic Obstruction - A Retrospective Review of The Novel Experience Of 2 Tertiary Urology Centers JF - The Interventionalist Journal JA - TIJ VL - 3 IS - 1 SE - Original Article DO - 10.32896/tij.v3n1.1-9 UR - https://theinterventionalists.com/index.php/journal/article/view/44 SP - 1-9 AB - <p><strong><em>Background: </em></strong>Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) is common in aging men with worldwide prevalence at 20-62%, while Malaysian prevalence was 39.3% (2001) and increased at 8% per decade. In surgical treatment of BPH, Trans-Urethral Resection of Prostate (TURP) remains the gold standard. Other surgical options would mostly also require general anesthesia (GA). Therefore, more Local-Anaesthesia (LA) based options should be made available for patients who are not fit or unwilling to be under GA. Those currently available LA-based procedure has shown promising results including prostatic stents and trans-urethral lifts, but have drawbacks due to being expensive, not widely available, less suitable in median lobe enlargement or may cause complications including migration, overgrowth of prostatic tissue or foreign-body related complications which may require GA for their treatment. Prostatic Artery Embolization (PAE), initially an LA-based emergency treatment option for persistent life-threatening hematuria from a bleeding BPH, now has been proven to be a safe elective treatment. In Malaysia this novel technique was first reported in 2017 for treatment of post TURP intractable hematuria.</p><p><strong><em>Methods and Material: </em></strong>We retrospectively evaluated all 13 catheter-dependent BPH patients in two tertiary urology centres treated with PAE from April 2019 until December 2021 to assess post-treatment efficacy.</p><p><strong><em>Results: </em></strong>One patient failed removal of catheter within 3 months post-procedure but 12 out of 13 patients safely got their catheter removed within 1-3 months and resulted in significant IPSS improvement.</p><p><strong><em>Conclusion:</em></strong> PAE is a safe and effective treatment option for BPH patients of the Malaysian population but needs prospective evaluation.</p><p><strong> </strong></p> ER -